Search for: "State v. Kramer"
Results 1 - 20
of 513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Turner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 9:33 am
Striking the Right Balance by Sarah Shirazyan (@sarahshirazyan) and Miranda Sissons (@MiraSissons) Presidential Immunity A Prudential Way Forward in Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
While states’ rights often involved slavery and white supremacy, states’ rights and state sovereignty were also invoked to defend the rights of northern citizens to resist efforts to enforce the Fugitive Slave laws. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
During the first week of constitutional law as conventionally taught in most American law schools (and as I teach it), students learn that, in the words of Chief Justice John Marshall speaking for the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade and removed constitutional protections for reproductive freedom, the process of amending state constitutions has activated and engaged citizens all over the country.The amendment process, whether at the state or federal level, is an important expression of what Larry Kramer of Stanford University calls “popular constitutionalism. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 pm
Kramer, the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
Kramer, Executive Director of George W. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:15 am
In S.I. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Following a preface in which Prof Xandra Kramer paints a vivid picture of Jonathan’s humanity, humour and wit, and an introduction by ourselves as the editors, Part I includes four chapters which address conceptual matters relating to the nature and scope of private international law. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
But, as explained in Counterman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Here is a copy of the decision in PDF: Maher v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm
Ltd v. 99 Trade Co. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
