Search for: "State v. Kramer"
Results 1 - 20
of 508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
Kramer, Executive Director of George W. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:15 am
In S.I. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Following a preface in which Prof Xandra Kramer paints a vivid picture of Jonathan’s humanity, humour and wit, and an introduction by ourselves as the editors, Part I includes four chapters which address conceptual matters relating to the nature and scope of private international law. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
But, as explained in Counterman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Here is a copy of the decision in PDF: Maher v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm
Ltd v. 99 Trade Co. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
Citing Kramer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
” “ Here, the plaintiffs failed to plead that, but for the defendants’ negligence, they would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506; Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813). [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm
” In Kramer v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Warren v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:04 pm
Kramer, 484 F.3d 666, 668 (4th Cir. 2007); see also Tsai-Yi Yang v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]
