Search for: "State v. Kremens" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
In the Ninth Circuit, the most important case to open the door to a broader category of conversion claims was Kremen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The Ninth Circuit takes this baffling approach in part due to the 20-year-old Sex.com case (Kremen v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:12 am
Quite a way to begin an opinion, from Kremen v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 1:08 pm by Naho Marcella Tajima
The view that domain names are not personal property can be viewed as contrary to the Ninth Circuit’s well-known 2003 ruling in Gary Kremen v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
To the extent that Mostyn J followed Nicholas in Kremen (formerly Agrest) v Agrest [2010] EWHC 3091 (Fam), [2011] 2 F.L.R. 490 and in Hope v Krejci [2012] EWHC 1780 (Fam) and treated company law principles as inapplicable in family cases, the court disagreed, so Kremen and Hope are doubted. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
Full report: Bailii.Kremen v Agrest [2012] EWCA Civ 1266 (18 September 2012)Applications for permission to appeal the judgment in Kremen v Agrest (No.11) (Financial Remedy: Non-Disclosure: Post-Nuptial Agreement). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am by Venkat
I was surprised to see the court treat the domain name registration rights as a contract right, rather than a property right, given that numerous cases have discussed the issue since Kremen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tullett Prebon Plc & Ors v BGC Brokers LP & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 131 (22 February 2011) Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120 (22 February 2011) PO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 132 (22 February 2011) Goad v Butcher & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 158 (22 February 2011) Bateman, R (on the application of) v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2011] EWCA Civ 157 (22… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 4:27 am by Walter Olson
(0) Update: New York bill banning short-term rentals (0) Update: Indian sovereignty advances (0) Update: court dismisses Kremen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:45 pm by Venkat
" With respect to plaintiffs' conversation claim, the court notes the historical trend away from limiting conversation claims to tangible property (citing to Kremen v. [read post]