Search for: "State v. Kuklinski"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
First Amendment: Restrictions on Protected Speech The court thinks that the law is likely to be subject to strict scrutiny because it’s both a speaker-based and content-based restriction: On its face, the Act distinguishes between different websites—exempting some and targeting others—and therefore, appears speaker-based….The Act’s exemption of “widely recognized” “media outlets” and product review sites bolsters this conclusion…… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 3:31 pm
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am
Kuklinski was then prompted to take a photograph of his driver’s license or other state identification card. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
That remarkable behavior is constitutional pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]