Search for: "State v. LAXTON" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
” Implied-in-Law Contract/Unjust Enrichment The court says that these state law claims are preempted by copyright law. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyright Litigation Blog) YouTube – Tech groups ask court to preserve DMCA safe harbors: Viacom v Youtube (Public Knowledge) (EFF) (Ars Technica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit applies California law to domain name ownership dispute and remands for determination of whether ‘innocent purchaser’ defense applies: CRS Recovery, Inc v Laxton (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)… [read post]