Search for: "State v. Laster"
Results 21 - 40
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:55 pm
” However, in series of cases following the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
Transcript, Strategic Funding Source Holdings LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm
” That said, Laster still concluded that the plaintiffs had not stated a claim for breach of the duty of oversight against the director defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 12:04 pm
To state a claim under this theory, the plaintiffs must allege facts supporting an inference that the directors knew about a problem—epitomized by the proverbial red flag—yet consciously ignored it. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:13 pm
Jan. 26, 2023), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Laster, V.C.) held that officers of a Delaware corporation are subject to a fiduciary duty of oversight as articulated in In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 5:26 pm
City of Huntington v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
Laster is quite correct when he quotes extensively from prior Delaware Supreme Court decisions stating that “the fiduciary duties of officers are the same as those of directors. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lebanon County Employees’ Retirement Fund, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm
Laster. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
Laster, 581 A.2d 1127, 1134 (Del. 1990). [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
From Momotaz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am
Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:34 am
Allen, May 24, Laster, T.).2019 plan. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:18 am
Dennis, Contrivance and Collusion: The Corporate Origins of Shareholder Derivative Litigation in the United States, 67 Rutgers U. [read post]
