Search for: "State v. Laster"
Results 101 - 120
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 1:33 pm
” Indeed, Justice Valihura noted that Vice Chancellor Laster, in an immediate post-trial reaction, stated that “the credibility of the people on the [B]oard” was “very, very strong. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Pell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 1:21 pm
” Supreme Court Hears Registration Case This brings us to the case of Nichols v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
In the recent decision of Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:45 pm
Vice Chancellor Laster likened the case to Quadrant Structured Products Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:11 am
See RBC Capital Mkts., LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
See RBC Capital Mkts., LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:02 am
In Tooley v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:52 pm
Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm
” Laster then added a note of modesty, with his observation that “to state the obvious, this is the opinion of one trial judge. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:24 pm
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:44 am
On January 12, 2015, Vice Chancellor Laster of the Delaware Chancery Court granted the plaintiff’s motion for reargument and revived the breach of contract claims that the court had previously held to be untimely in Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-SL1 v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
In City of Providence v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
Passive acceptance of potentially preclusive deal protection mechanisms may rise to the level of stating a breach of loyalty claim in a sale of control situation. [read post]
