Search for: "State v. Lattimore" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm by Dan Ernst
[Earlier I noted an event sponsored by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, entitled "The DC Circuit in the McCarthy Era: United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While plaintiff cites to cases where a legal malpractice claim was held viable despite a settlement in the underlying action (Cohen v Lipsig, 92 AD2d 536 [2d Dept 1983]; Lattimore v Bergman, 224 AD2d 497 [2d Dept 1996]; Mazzei v Pokorny, Schrenzel & Pokorny, 125 AD2d 374 [1986]), these cases are distinguishable as none relate to a claim where the attorneys pressured a client to enter into a settlement; rather the cases cited involve circumstances… [read post]