Search for: "State v. Lea" Results 81 - 100 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
I am still working on a comment on the substantive aspects of today's Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the founder remained a major stockholder of LEA, he resigned from its board. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:09 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court’s holding in Scott’s case that slaves were not citizens and could not sue in the courts later earned Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Harold Koh, recently returned to academia from his tenure as the Legal Advisor to the Secretary of State in the Obama administration, will chair and moderate.Moderator: Harold Hongju Koh, Yale Law SchoolSpeaker: Professor Pär Kristoffer Cassel, University of Michigan Department of HistorySpeaker: Tahirih V. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:32 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: CHRISTOPHER HARIGNORDOQUY v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Harold Koh, recently returned to academia from his tenure as the Legal Advisor to the Secretary of State in the Obama administration, will chair and moderate.Moderator: Harold Hongju Koh, Yale Law SchoolSpeaker: Professor Pär Kristoffer Cassel, University of Michigan Department of HistorySpeaker: Tahirih V. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:31 am by Florian Mueller
I just learned from a spokeswoman for the Munich I Regional Court that a Microsoft v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  While the Court of Appeal affirmed summary adjudication of the discrimination claims in the City’s favor (because it was a separate entity from the state-funded LEA and its siting approval was not a state-funded activity), it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the CEQA claims. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]