Search for: "State v. Lea"
Results 101 - 120
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
Silberman, Goodyear and Nicastro: Observations from a Transnational and Comparative Perspective Lea Brilmayer & Matthew Smith, The (Theoretical) Future of Personal Jurisdiction: Issues Left Open by Goodyear Dunlop Tires v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:19 am
The statute of limitations recognizes two exceptions – cases in which the parent was prevented from requesting the hearing due either to specific misrepresentations by the LEA that it had resolved the problem or to the LEA’s withholding of information that the IDEA requires it to provide. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 pm
In Kuleana Ku‘ikahi, LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:12 am
In Leese v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:56 pm
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, DW Aina Lea Development LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:33 am
Jones III of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in I.H. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:42 pm
Lea Johnston. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
See Zamsky v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm
Here's the abstract: In May 2009, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
: Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
Comm. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
An interesting aspect of the Court's recent decision in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm
In Bridge Aina Lea, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
Representing Appellee (Defendant): Lea Kuvinka, Kuvinka & Kuvinka, Jackson, Wyoming. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
TweetIn Feldman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
See, e.g., Lea v. [read post]
