Search for: "State v. Leahy" Results 101 - 120 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Beth Graham
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Jodie Liu
See our summary of the bill from a couple weeks ago for a detailed account and a comparison to the previous Senate bill proposed by Senator Leahy nearly a year ago. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Here are links to important resources and commentary on the state of indigent defense at Gideon's golden anniversary: ACLU: "Too Many Still Wait to Hear Gideon's Trumpet" Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: "'Gideon v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
The bill would overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Reigel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
 USPTO Director David Kappos stated:  “Since the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, we have worked in concert with our stakeholder community to launch transformative initiatives to improve the way Americans innovate, and the way the USPTO handles those innovations. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
All of this hubbub surrounds the Supreme Court decision in the PLIVA v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
One would think the Department would have at least a smidgen of modesty in these matters, having taken a pasting during the Bush Administration in Medellin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Steven Boutwell
On April 29, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued opinions in both Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]