Search for: "State v. Leisinger" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm by John Jascob
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.NexPoint Advisors, L.P. has filed a shareholder complaint against TICC Capital Corp. and certain of its directors and officers seeking to remedy a number of state and federal violations. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:40 am by John Jascob
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. has filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Second Circuit’s decision that the tolling rule set forth in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Under Exchange Act Section 16(b) and Rule 16b-6, the entities were required to disgorge profits only up to the amount of the premium received by the writer of the put, the panel stated (Olagues v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:51 am by John Jascob
In addition, the court stated, under the test articulated by the Supreme Court in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:54 am by John Jascob
The court permanently enjoined the defendant from further violations and ordered payment of nearly $650,000 in disgorgement and penalties (SEC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:50 am by John Jascob
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.A Second Circuit panel vacated a judgment to the extent that the district court denied leave to amend to add securities fraud claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:43 am by John Jascob
“The board well understood that the deal had been struck,” the court stated. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:27 am by John Jascob
By Amy Leisinger, J.D.The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed chancery court decisions appointing a custodian to sell a highly profitable, yet managerially dysfunctional company and requiring one of the company’s CEOs to pay over $7.1 million in sanctions to his business partner in connection with litigation misconduct. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 12:18 pm by HRWatchdog
Workers’ Comp Ruling In 2002, however, the entire panel of workers’ compensation judges decided in the case of Navarro v. [read post]