Search for: "State v. Leisure"
Results 201 - 220
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The GC found to be equally irrelevant the circumstance that K-Swiss managed to have the five stripes registered as trade mark in eight Member States. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Readers are invited to peruse it at their leisure and decide for themselves whether the mark is either descriptive or devoid of distinctive character for them]. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
Whether it's codeine or Viagra or whatever, the state's entitled to find out what drugs you take at its leisure. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
The style of the case is, The Burlington Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:02 am
Relying on prior precedent, the malpractice investigation proceeded at a "relatively leisurely pace, which was perfectly reasonable given the clearly stated law at the time. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:14 pm
(Legislature v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
While the parties' respective trading activities happen to be quite different right now, business models change from time to time as opportunities, leisure activities and technological convergence evolve. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm
This is related, I think, to a passage in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
” Baures v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
Does the recent case of Warner v Armfield Retail & Leisure Ltd change how an employer should react? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
It was held that holidays are designed to be a period of “relaxation and leisure”, whilst sick leave is designed to enable the worker to recover from an illness. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:31 pm
In Hirst v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
In Headifen v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
The European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) has handed down its judgment in a key, long-running TUPE case – Alemo-Herron v Parkwood Leisure Ltd. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:48 pm
., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
This is not an article about leisure reading of ebooks. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
” Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
