Search for: "State v. Leisure" Results 221 - 240 of 419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am by Graham Smith
Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am by Francisco Macías
  This was to be a time of complete and uninhibited leisure and merrymaking. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am by David J. DePaolo
Though he didn't attend the meeting he was still paid for the two hours that the meeting would have taken because his former supervisor considered that he would not have been in the motorcycle accident but for the meeting.The workers' compensation judge, the Appeals Board and the 5th District all found compensability.In Kansas, the state Supreme Court sent a case back to the fact finding courts to determine if an employee who was injured in a go-kart accident was in the course and scope of… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Peter Vickery
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Peter Vickery
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am by Jonathan Macey
  So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Woolley & Anor v Ultimate Products Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1038 (26 July 2012) Westcoast (Holdings) Ltd v Wharf Land Subsidiary (No 1) Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1003 (26 July 2012) Peaktone Ltd v Joddrell [2012] EWCA Civ 1035 (26 July 2012) NHS Leeds v Larner [2012] EWCA Civ 1034 (25 July 2012) YZ (China), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1022… [read post]