Search for: "State v. Leisure"
Results 301 - 320
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 8:56 pm
If you compare that with information from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, like Felony Sentences in State Courts, you can see some of the differences. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
[Baures v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
In Bartning v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Lemley: think about mental state and the negligence analogy. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
… Local state supervision liability? [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:43 am
In the Second District's recent decision in People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
The January 19, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion Myers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
Beery, Deputy JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES FILED: 07/21/2006 PHYSICIANS CHOICE OF ARIZONA INC. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
After all, the Captain and Tennille and leisure suits made sense in 1980 to some people. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
After all, the Captain and Tennille and leisure suits made sense in 1980 to some people. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm
After all, the Captain and Tennille and leisure suits made sense in 1980 to some people. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:28 am
However, it was noted in Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:57 am
The Skocir v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Lord Hoffmann (in the minority) gave real weight to the editorial discretion, stating at [62]: “Editorial decisions have to be made quickly and with less information than is available to a court which afterwards reviews the matter at leisure. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
And that just covers the United States. [read post]
