Search for: "State v. Leisure"
Results 141 - 160
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm
But he'd probably have been perfectly happy with a dispute over the ownership of a wall, as in The Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 2556 (Ch) (11 September 2015).Separating intellectual property from the concrete items in or on which it is carried or displayed is a big conceptual problem for anyone coming fresh to the topic. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:57 am
Winslow Jr. v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am
This is a peculiar vision, but Marbury v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
In reacting to the Apple II, Ken Olson, founder of Digital Equipment Corp. stated, "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
We’ll leave the details to your leisure time reading. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:47 pm
’ R.K. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 5:14 pm
In Michael JD v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:06 am
In reaching this view, this Kat does not rely on the reasoning of the CJEU decision in Case C-403/08 FAPL v QC Leisure [2011]. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:15 am
In the case, Carlson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
”http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14278737.Glasgow_pub__quot_first_in_Scotland_quot__to_receive_penalty_for_Premier_League_copyright_breach/Joined cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd More on the Karen Murphy case here. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm
V. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
The initial comment, posted in January 2010, stated, in part:`This is what I would like to consider a public service profile for anyone that is not aware of Mr. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
As Annsley explains in this post, that litigation started back in 2012 and focuses on an exciting Rovi's patent - European Patent (UK) No 0, 862,833 - which relates to interactive video communications and viewer-controlled selection of programming information.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:03 am
The plaintiff’s decision to wait until after a related action failed in Minnesota before bringing suit in “a rather leisurely fashion” in Delaware was unreasonable and caused the defendants prejudice in defending the suit and pursuing indemnification rights (Houseman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am
(Note there is some oversimplification below; for instance, the rules are different when the defender is actually the initial aggressor, for instance if D attacks V, V fights back, and then D kills V in “self-defense. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
In the absence of a precise legal definition of “private life” the principle has been interpreted broadly by the courts, which have held that a person’s private life includes his or her love life, friendships, family circumstances, leisure activities, political opinions, trade union or religious affiliation and state of health. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Articled clerks could go hungry ...Life in IP was much more leisurely in the 1970s than it is now, and not just because when you’d sent a letter you knew you had some breathing space before the answer came back. [read post]
