Search for: "State v. Leone" Results 21 - 40 of 1,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm by Matthew Nied
The President of Sierra Leone today stated that he was prepared to engage the Sierra Leone Association of Journalists (the “SLAJ”) to review criminal libel legislation contained in the Public Order Act, 1965 (see: legislation) (the “Libel Legislation”) that criminalizes statements that create disaffection against the government or injure the reputation of the government or individual officials (see: news article). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
This was sufficient to defeat the state's reliance on the good faith exception under Herring and Leon. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:38 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Request for trial postponement — Effort to obtain private counsel A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Harford County found Matthew Moorehead guilty of attempted voluntary manslaughter, two counts of second-degree assault, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, illegal possession of a regulated ... [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:04 am
Secretary of State for Health & Others Lord Chancellor v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:53 pm
Six days later, Gomez was arrested at the Mexico-United States border and charged with the instant offense of attempted reentry. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by William McGrath
According to Professor Mike Koehler of the FCPA Professor Blog, Judge Leon stated: [V]iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, the Court does not believe the Government has produced sufficient evidence to enable a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that each of these six defendants participated in the overarching conspiracy charged in the superseding indictment in this case. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:50 pm by Michael Froomkin
I think the most one can say here is that if the Supreme Court wants to revisit Smith as five Justices may have signaled in United States v. [read post]