Search for: "State v. Levin"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2008, 7:21 pm
Levine case. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:35 am
Dick v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:46 am
Before Levine, quite a few cases – we can think of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:15 pm
Levine v Smithtown Central School District Defendants brought about a motion for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiff, Melissa Levine’s alleged disability discrimination action. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
Sam Levine and Kira Lerner for The Guardian: In 2013, the US supreme court gutted the pre-clearance requirement in a landmark case called Shelby county v Holder. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:15 am
Oklahoma v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 6:14 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249, the Court will decide whether the FDA's prescription drug labeling judgments preempt state law liability claims... [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:51 am
Levine. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:29 am
Levine's state tort claim was preempted by federal law. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:41 am
A good piece on the WSJ Law Blog regarding the Levine v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:48 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Yet, the CFAA was a hotly contested issue in Nelson Levine De Luca & Hamilton, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:25 pm
Today â [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:28 pm
Levine, 129 S. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Levine that Diana Levine's state-law claim for negligent failure to warn was not preempted by the FDA's regulation of Phenergan's labeling under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
In reading Justice Alito’s dissent in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
Levine. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:41 pm
Levine here. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:34 am
Levine, the Supreme Court held generally that the FDA's marketing approval of a drug and its labeling does not preempt a state-law personal-injury suit premised on the inadequacy of that labeling. [read post]
