Search for: "State v. Levinson" Results 221 - 240 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Much of Masur’s book focuses on debates over state law and state-level civil rights reform efforts, whereas my collection focuses on federal law and national-level constitutional reform efforts. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:30 am by JB
Jackson Women's Health Organization that will appear in this year’s Levinson Balkin Con Law supplement. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 7:45 am by Alfred Brophy
Haverty-Stacke, Trotskyists on Trial: Free Speech and Political Persecution Since the Age of FDR Sanford V. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:11 am by John Jascob
In addition, the ICI urged the SEC to explicitly affirm that its standards of conduct would preempt any state law standards of conduct inconsistent with the SEC’s. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:28 am by John Jascob
At issue is whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
See Statement of Interest of the United States Regarding Proposed Class Settlement in The Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:00 am by JB
David Sehat: I do agree with Levinson, although I didn't make a big deal about it in the book. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 12:54 am
Levinson (University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy Levinson has argued that the Americans in 1776 were actually secessionists, not revolutionaries. [read post]