Search for: "State v. Levinson"
Results 41 - 60
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Senate: today a majority of the U.S. population, concentrated in 9 states, is represented by a very small minority of 18% of Senate seats (Levinson 2010; Levinson and Levinson 2019, 39; Levinson and Balkin 2019, 178). [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This is not to say that there have not been moments of state oppression for which armed resistance would have been helpful: think black Americans in the Jim Crow south. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
State L. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Have our views of the goal or purpose of a free state changed over time? [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
” (Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution, p. 5). [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Maryland, and West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
On the state level, formal constitutional change is persistent and ongoing. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While many critics of the United States Constitution have lamented the extreme difficulty of amending the document because of the hurdles posed by Article V’s rigorous requirements, Sandy Levinson has been prominent and prolific in highlighting how too many scholars today sing the praises of a document that is essentially unfixable and calling into question our almost religious veneration for it. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
In roughly the same time period, Professor Sanford Levinson—Sandy, to his friends—published a set of essays posing essentially the same question, with one key difference. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Becerra (2018) (dealing with compelled speech regarding abortion), and Janus v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Douglas Laycock Sandy Levinson has been my friend and colleague for more than forty years. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
John Olusegun Adenitire I In the last chapter of Wrestling with Diversity, Sandy Levinson and Rachel Levinson ask ‘why should practices rooted in religious belief be treated differently than "cultural norms," whether for good (…) or potentially even for ill (…)? [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
I do have some quibbles with Levinson’s discussion. [read post]
