Search for: "State v. Levitt"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 7:48 am
Speaking of Texas, it is interesting to note that the Latino-majority district (Texas 23) that was redrawn following the Supreme Court's decision in LULAC v Perry has now switched back into Republican hands. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:49 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Abel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
In Farrakhan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:16 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:32 am
Mar 27, 2007) (NO. 401726/06)Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, (James J. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Levitt. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Kindred Nursing Centers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
The UCC 9 v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Justin Levitt analyzes last week’s oral argument in the Alabama redistricting cases, focusing on “the rationale behind Alabama’s last state legislative redistricting plan. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:49 am
Reit v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:25 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
In the most recent controversy, Levitt v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
And the opinion dubiously distinguished the Levitt v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Husted v. [read post]
