Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:17 pm
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:17 pm
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
It would even be open to liberal red-state supreme courts to find a state constitutional right to abortion, at least pending recall or reversal by the voters.But now suppose the Supreme Court were to overrule Fisher v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:11 am
An early explanation of the liberal grant comes from United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:10 pm
This may not be an original thought, but I had an epiphany last year while teaching Prigg v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:48 pm
Harper rejected the most extreme version of the independent state legislature theory, it endorsed another theory that amounts to a “time bomb:” It is indeed a cause for… Continue reading The post Social Choice Theory, the Independent State Legislature Theory, Insincere Voting, and the Missing Liberal Dissents in Moore v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Most of all, it presents a full-blown, positive theory of constitutional liberalism that aims to maintain liberalism’s core commitment to individual autonomy and liberty while recognizing a substantial role for the state in creating a civic culture. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
In particular, I have been thinking about it as a result of a gut feeling that the ‘2 v. 3’ debate is largely occurring within a vacuum, with not enough attention being paid to the current (beleaguered) state of the United States’ higher education system as a whole. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Thus, not only would proponents of liberal constitutional change need to secure ratification from all states where she crossed the 40% mark – a group including states such as Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas – they also would have to pick up five states that voted more than three-to-two against Senator Clinton. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:13 am
In Iowa, a coalition of a dozen church leaders held a news conference to announce their support for a proposed amendment to the state's civil rights law that would bar discrimination on the basis of sexuality and gender identity. 365Gay reported yesterday that the Interfaith Alliance of Iowa includes representatives of the United Church of Christ, the Unitarian Church, and the Episcopal Diocese.Meanwhile, V. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 12:00 pm
Or, as the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:12 am
We need liberal ideals, powerfully stated.... [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:32 am
By Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column discusses last week's SCOTUS decision in Filarsky v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #10 Sexual Preference Discrimination and the (Il)Liberal State Lofton v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
But even if a state legislature were to adopt this misguided measure, Bush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
”) Earlier today, Eugene V. provided an excellent summary. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
Tompkins and United States v. [read post]
