Search for: "State v. Lindner" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 8:19 am by Peter Bert
The Court’s First Chamber ruled, firstly, that the Council Regulation on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters did apply in the Lindner case, since an action is brought before a court of a Member State against a national of another Member State whose domicile is unknown to that court. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:41 am by Gilles Cuniberti
In a judgment of November 17, 2011, the first chamber of the European Court of Justice ruled in Hypotecní banka a.s. v Lindner (case C-327/10) that defendants with unknown domicile are domiciled at their last known domicile for the purpose of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Co. v Nicoletti, 11 AD3d 702, 702 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Lindner v Wilkerson, 2 AD3d 500, 501-502; Fennell v New York Cent. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
Lindner DUTCHESS COUNTYTrusts and EstatesPlaintiff Not Duly Appointed Executor; Lacks Capacity to Sue for Decedent's Wrongful Death Alexis v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To establish that they were intended third-party beneficiaries, plaintiffs must establish “(1) the existence of a valid and binding contract between other parties, (2) that the contract was intended for his/her benefit and (3) that the benefit to him/her is sufficiently immediate, rather than incidental, to indicate the assumption by the contracting parties of a duty to compensate him if the benefit is lost” (State of California… [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:06 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The Court had already addressed the issue in its Lindner case last year. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
With Michael Edenborough QC and Brigitte Lindner speaking, it's no surprise that it's nearly fully-subscribed. [read post]