Search for: "State v. Ling " Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Still Eleonora discusses article 17 obligations of the DSM directive.Trade marksEleonora Rosati posts Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade mark.PatentPeter Ling writes Where is Haar and how did it get there? [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Interestingly, with regard to this last issue, the Constitutional Court refers to the CJEU decision C-146/13 Spain v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 7:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justin Ling has summarizes how the budget includes a cash infusion for the justice system, Amid longstanding concerns that Canada’s court system is underfunded to address the volume of cases it currently faces — a concern exacerbated by the 2016 Supreme Court ruling in R. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 6:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Therefore, a plaintiff who claimed a prospective employer refused to hire him because he opposed his former employer’s race discrimination stated a valid cause of action (Zhu v. [read post]