Search for: "State v. Ling "
Results 61 - 80
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2017, 6:20 pm
Ling, et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:03 pm
Ling, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” In Murr v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”· Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”· Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India· Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:34 pm
Chan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:29 pm
In Ling v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 5:21 am
See Morse v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
’Murphy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
(Citing Desmond v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 11:57 am
Yu-Ling Teng is a naturalized U.S. citizen. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:20 am
Russo v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
It's all Greek, but opposition succeeds in the endCase T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu is a grand old General Court scrap in which everyone guesses how modern Greek consumers might view a word that orginated from Classical Greek. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 3:36 am
See: R. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
