Search for: "State v. List"
Results 1 - 20
of 30,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
Here is a complete list to the SCOTUSBlog On-Line Symposium on United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:31 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:45 pm
Today the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:56 am
EN (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; KC (South Africa) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 630; [2009] WLR (D) 213 “The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Specification of Particularly Serious Crimes) Order 2004, which was made under s 72(4)(a) of the 2002 Act and listed a [...] [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In Byrd v United States, 584 U. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health [2008] EWHC 1891(Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 290 “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled on appeal to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the Secretary of State at the initial decision-making stage,… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm
NOT CHARGED – Solicitation of Prostitution- State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm
Here are three of them:United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
As noted in my critique of State v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:43 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A provision which prevented the Secretary of State for the Home Department from considering whether certain listed countries would return asylum seekers in violation of their human rights did not enact an absolute bar, but was limited in scope. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
EPA and United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:38 am
At 12:00 p.m. on April 16, 2013, the State Bar's Labor and Employment Law Section, in conjunction with the Antitrust Section, will present the latest in its Watch List series of webinars: Comcast v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 11:38 am
The only United States Supreme Court Justice to make the list is Justice Elena Kagan, for her dissent in Williams v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:17 am
R (Wright and others) v Secretary of State for Health and another [2009] UKHL 3; [2009] WLR (D) 20 “The procedure under s 82(4)(b) of the Care Standards Act 2000 allowing the provisional listing of care workers as being unsuited to work with vulnerable adults after a complaint had been made about them, without giving them [...] [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:15 am
The difference between a mandatory list and a non-mandatory listWall v Town of Niskayuna, USDC, N.D.N.Y. 1-29-2009, 07-CV-350, decided May 22, 2009One of the central issues in the Wall case* concerning the 2005 promotion of a police officer from Sergeant to Lieutenant was the allegation that the promotion was made from a civil service list that was invalid because it contained the names of only two candidates while three were needed to constitute a valid list.Making a… [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
Here is a list of the expert and other opinion witnesses the defense intends to present in the hearing, beginning Monday, on the constitutionality under the Eighth Amendment of Texas’s death penalty procedure: State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 2:13 pm
In Bufkin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm
United States, 10-6549, relisted 1/7, 1/14; and Howes v. [read post]
