Search for: "State v. Literal" Results 1 - 20 of 4,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 10:49 pm by Firemark Law Team
  Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/122 “THE ROOM WHERE IT HAPPENED” MOVES TOWARDS PUBLICATIONUnited States of America v John R. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
  If that change shuts out the legislature, more  or less entirely, that could be a constitutional problem, or so it appeared during the argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm by Steven Calabresi
 Income literally has to "come in" before it is taxable both as the word was used in 1913 and based on its etymology.The post Moore v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 12:00 am by Brett M. Hill
On September 15, 2011, the Washington State Supreme Court overruled the prior decision from the Court of Appeals in Williams v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:20 am by Jeremy Tyler
Last November, in A House on the Beach, Literally, I wrote about the Texas Supreme Court decision in Severance v. [read post]