Search for: "State v. Litteral" Results 41 - 60 of 287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:24 am by Alison Rowe
Paul Husband             In June of 2011, the United States Tax Court decided Van Dusen v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm by David Gallacher and Bryce Chadwick
” We hear it in advertising; we hear it in the State of the Union; and we find it littered throughout government buying priorities. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Martin’s argument is that under Blakely v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm by Stuart Kaplow
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]