Search for: "State v. Little Bear" Results 1 - 20 of 2,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2009, 7:59 am
Thanks to this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, which is titled "Felons and the Right To Bear Arms," I discovered that late yesterday the North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Britt v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 8:25 pm by Adrea Korthase
I agree with Judge Kopf that there is a mythology surrounding  Standing Bear v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 8:25 pm by Adrea Korthase
I agree with Judge Kopf that there is a mythology surrounding  Standing Bear v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:50 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch, the public interest organization that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it filed a petition on October 27, 2011, with the United States Supreme Court on behalf of former Federal Reserve employee Vern McKinley asking the High Court to review a lower court ruling validating the Federal Reserve’s decision to withhold documents about its $29 billion bailout of Bear Stearns (Vern McKinley v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 10:22 pm by Tom Smith
The Third Circuit has issued an opinion that has received little attention over the right to bear arms, but it should. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:27 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg In drug trial, testimony that hotel clerk saw the defendant drop "a little baggy containing a ‘white substance'" was relevant even without any evidence confirming the nature of the substance, in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:33 am by Isaul Verdin, Immigration Lawyer
., Associate Attorney at the Verdin Law Firm, LLC On December 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Judulang v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) When the Supreme Court for the first time recognized the existence of an individual right to bear arms in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am by Neil Wilkof
Little Hare Gin had not provided any evidence of use in the marketplace or stated whether these brands had registered their marks. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States as conferring constitutional status on the warnings and the associated exclusionary rule. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]