Search for: "State v. London"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 327 S.W.3d 118, 130 n. 8 (Tex. 2010) 2 Musgrove v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Ofcom, Transport for London (TfL) and Ernst & Young (EY) have confirmed they are the latest victims of the cyber-attack by Russian ransomware group Clop. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
In chapter 16, Marc H Greenberg addresses the case of the Estate of Elvis Presley v Russen and the right of publicity. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Freedman for drawing our attention to this paywalled story in the National Law Journal by Jimmy Hoover, on the publication of ‘The History of Double Jeopardy and Criminal Jurisdiction: US v Gamble (2019) and R v Hutchinson (1677)," Law Quarterly Review 139 (2023): 390-411, by Peter Alldridge, Queen Mary University of London, and Ann Mumford, Kings College London. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:29 am
[4] e.g. s9 Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1976 and s74 London Local Authorities Act 2007. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
Cal.): FTC's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A Dailge & Daniel V. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
On Wednesday 7th June the Court will hand-down judgment in London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health [2023] UKSC 18. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Holland, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, May 27, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, legislation, Monetary policy, State regulation Significant Amendments to Private Fund Adviser Reporting on Form PF Posted by Diane Blizzard and Radhika Kshatriya, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Sunday, May 28, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Form PF, Investment advisers, Private equity, Private funds, SEC enforcement The Imperfect CEO Posted by Justus… [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Holland, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, May 27, 2023 Tags: anti-ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, legislation, Monetary policy, State regulation Significant Amendments to Private Fund Adviser Reporting on Form PF Posted by Diane Blizzard and Radhika Kshatriya, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Sunday, May 28, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Form PF, Investment advisers, Private equity, Private funds, SEC enforcement The Imperfect CEO Posted by Justus… [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
Tyler v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that the participating States in the UPC and UPCA agreement are not the same and that, in the case of the UPCA, they are not all EU Member States. [read post]
