Search for: "State v. Longmore" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
In January, I blogged that the UK Court of Appeal agreed to hear the case of Tracey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
In AEI Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507, Lord Woolf MR stated: “…it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs of a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:45 am by Matthew Hill
KH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1354 (Sedley LJ, Longmore LJ, Aikens LJ): Only in very exceptional cases would withdrawal of medical treatment as a result of ordering the return of a failed asylum seeker constitute a breach of Article 3 ECHR. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
 Kitchin LJ giving the leading judgment, with which Moses LJ and Longmore LJ agreed in the traditional formula, analysed each criticism of the judge's findings, and in each case upheld the first instance judgment. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 7:14 am by E. R. Wrigley
JA (Ivory Coast) and ES (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for  the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1353 (CA (Civ Div) (Sedley LJ, Longmore LJ, Aikens LJ) In these two cases, heard together, the Court of Appeal provided clarification of the circumstances in which Art. 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights entitles foreign nationals’ to remain in the UK in order to receive medical treatment. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
In Cream v Banerjee Lord Nicholls addressed this provision and said it demanded flexibility in its application. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:52 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
This was stated as the amount of the participation plus accrued interest up to the Settlement Date. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:04 am
On 12th November the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Limit No. 2 Limited v AXA. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:46 am
" In the Court of Appeal Longmore LJ found that if a legal action had been commenced or a reference in arbitration had been constituted in a Member State, other than that in which the insolvency proceedings had been opened, it was natural that the law of that Member State should determine whether that action or that reference should be continued or discontinued. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am by Karon Monaghan QC
Lord Justice Longmore reminded us in Rights of Women that, “legal aid is one of the hallmarks of a civilised society”. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
If that is right then the test propounded by Longmore LJ [in Hussain v GMC [2014] EWCA Civ 2246] would impose a higher standard than the test which applies to non-medical endeavours. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
If we consider the ruling of Longmore LJ in the Court of Appeal decision in UK Housing Alliance v Francis (which we discussed here) he states that the Act contains a "pervading reference to money 'paid' by the tenant to the landlord, 'received' by the landlord and 'repayable' by the landlord to the tenant". [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
If we consider the ruling of Longmore LJ in the Court of Appeal decision in UK Housing Alliance v Francis (which we discussed here) he states that the Act contains a "pervading reference to money 'paid' by the tenant to the landlord, 'received' by the landlord and 'repayable' by the landlord to the tenant". [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
 The Court held that: Decisions weighing the public interest in deportation against the private interest of the appellant and his family in his private and family life are often difficult and cannot easily be categorised as perverse” [§23] Lord Justice Longmore referred to MA (Somalia) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 49 when the Supreme Court reminded the Court of Appeal that it: should not be astute to characterise as an error of law what is no more than a… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
Lord Justice Longmore (who gave the leading judgment) stated that the whole purpose of the balance achieved by the Bermuda Form (English arbitration but applying New York law to issues arising under the policy) was that judicial remedies in respect of the award should only be those permitted by English law. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Isabel McArdle
Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 – Read judgment This appeal raises interesting questions about the approach the courts should take when considering whether detention pending deportation is legal in a case involving an ex-convict with serious psychiatric illness. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:24 am by Matthew Perry, Olswang LLP
  He also doubted the reasoning of the trial judge regarding negative declaratory relief being an appropriate remedy, stating that it is “at best, an ungainly remedy”. [read post]