Search for: "State v. Loss" Results 121 - 140 of 19,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 4:07 am by Zaid Majiet
The court found in favour of the employer, stating that the restraint of trade clause in the employment contract was neither unreasonable nor contrary to public policy and should stand. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The 1997 PDRS was in use, and it specifically stated that its MDT was intended as a guide only. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
  However, the commentary in the Proposed Rule states that this threshold question is effectively tied to the sector descriptions in the critical infrastructure Sector-Specific Plans (“SSPs”) that were developed pursuant to PPD-21. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:26 pm by Andrew Crocker
EFF signed on to an amicus brief drafted by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers earlier this month petitioning the Oregon Supreme Court to review State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
In Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:18 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Frantic, Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London case number B326222, in the Court of Appeal in the State of California, Second Appellate District (18 March 2024)] [read post]