Search for: "State v. Lozada"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Ene v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
Lauren Devendorf and Luis Lozada preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:17 pm
Lozada v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:13 pm
In Fadiga v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
Lozada preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
Luis Lozada and Tyler Schmitt have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:32 pm
State. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Wash. 2002); Lozada v. [read post]
