Search for: "State v. Lucero"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
Minnesota Minnesota Republican legislator Eric Lucero filed a lawsuit against the Minnesota Secretary of State, alleging that a state court consent decree extending the time for election officials to receive absentee ballots violates federal law. [read post]
16 May 2022, 2:47 pm
From today's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:30 am
Roberta V. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am
” New Jersey is the last state without a law legalizing at least some cottage food sales [Amelia Nierenberg, New York Times] Reversing district court, Fifth Circuit panel upholds Indian Child Welfare Act against constitutional objections; dissent by Judge Owen finds a commandeering problem [Brackeen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:46 am
Louisiana is here, and and there's a briefer synopsis of Lucero v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:01 am
In large part, the district court had relied on a New Mexico Supreme Court decision, Lucero v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm
Progressive and Lucero v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am
[Indeed, federal district courts have rejected Iskanian’s conclusions in Lucero v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
WETLANDS United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:16 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 3:02 am
Nevertheless, the court held that what the Hartes experienced qualified as unreasonable search and seizure – and also let them continue with their state-law claims – so Harte v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Lucero of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:16 am
In Vasquez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:46 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision last year in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
