Search for: "State v. Lujan" Results 201 - 220 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:07 am
The court’s analysis of the Gap’s objection to standing focused on the first element of the Lujan test (Lujan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:10 am
Wong (2008) __ Cal.App.4th __ (formerly entitled Lujan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
City of San Diego, No. 05-56366 In the context of standing under Article III, the three elements of Lujan v. [read post]