Search for: "State v. Lunney" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the policy underlying the rule established in Carmel v Lunney, supra, does not require dismissal of the entirety of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim, because the remainder of his claim that defendants failed to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of traveling outside the United States as a result of entering a guilty plea does not dispute the validity of his conviction (see generally Carmel v Lunney, supra; see… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)9. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
Lunney, 70 N.Y.2d 169, 173, 511 N.E.2d 1126, 518 N.Y.S.2d 605 (1987). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
(see e.g., Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169). [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lunney: You show larger revenues for big content industries in nations with fair use v. those without, but you aren’t making causal claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lunney, 70 N.Y.2d 169, 173, 511 N.E.2d 1126, 518 N.Y.S.2d 605 (N.Y. 1987). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:45 pm by aallwash
Underlying the discussion was the Fifth Circuit’s correct finding in Veeck v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, because Brooks plead guilty to certain tax evasion counts, those convictions were not abated by the Second Circuit in United States v Brooks (872 F3d 78, 87-88 [2d Cir 2017)). [read post]