Search for: "State v. M. D. M."
Results 1 - 20
of 9,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam); [2011] WLR (D) 283 “Pursuant to section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 it was not in the best interests of a patient diagnosed as being in a minimally conscious state to authorise the withdrawal of all life sustaining treatment including nutrition and hydration by artifical means (‘ANH’).” WLR Daily, 28th September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:55 am
Regina (M) v Haringey Independent Appeal Panel (Secretary of State for Schools, Families and Children intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1103; [2010] WLR (D) 245 “An inquiry pursuant to s 86(3) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 into whether compliance with a parent’s preference as to the school at which he wished education to be provided for his child would prejudice the provision of efficient education or the efficient use of resources was to… [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 6:57 am
Carl D. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:36 am
Articles 28 and 30 EC and abuse of rights Article 28 of the EC Treaty prohibits quantitative restrictions on imports between member states and all measures having equivalent effect. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
M/V Vinson (D. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:41 am
I'm looking forward to the Supreme Court's ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:40 pm
In Guilford College et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:29 am
RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Müller Gmbh & Co KG (UK Production) [2010] UKSC 14; [2010] WLR (D) 75 “A draft contractual agreement to install equipment in a factory, which was never executed as the work was commenced, completed and partly paid for during the negotiations, took effect as a binding contract as the essential terms had been agreed and neither party had intended agreement of the remaining terms to be a precondition to a concluded… [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
(Sindell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
" Section 614 (d)(1)(A)(i)(IV). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:53 am
The post MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF PHYSICIANS v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
LEXIS 116118 (D PR, Aug. 19, 2014), a Puerto Rico federal district court held that a Puerto Rico police force officer had adequately stated an Establishment Clause claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
" State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:28 pm
To begin a state specific search, choose the first letter of the state you would like to search:A C D F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V W Whether you are a government zoning official determining other city zoning regulations, a developer researching available land, or a concerned citizen investigating government issues, GovScan is here to help. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 1:16 am
The post Guest Post: A New Twist in M&A Litigation: Section 11 Cases in State Court appeared first on The D&O Diary. [read post]
