Search for: "State v. MM"
Results 81 - 100
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Haemonetics v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 4:30 pm
” State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aziz v Aziz & Ors Rev 1 [2007] EWCA Civ 712 (11 July 2007) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 688 (11 July 2007) Adelson & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [2007] EWCA Civ 701 (09 July 2007) MM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 687 (06 July 2007) Togher v Revenue and Customs… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Parties Settle a Complaint of Sex Discrimination in Employment The case of L.C.C. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Parties Settle a Complaint of Sex Discrimination in Employment The case of L.C.C. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:38 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:38 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:04 pm
First, here is the basic demographic data: Minnesota Wisconsin Population (2009) 5.3 mm 5.7 mm Age under 18 24.3% 23.6% Age over 65 12.4% 13.2% Over 25, HS diploma 91.1% 89.0% Bachelor degree 31.2% 25.5% Below poverty line 10.0% 11.1% Foreign born 5.3% 3.6% Unemployment 5.8% 6.1% Not much to distinguish the states here. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:49 am
First, here is the basic demographic data: Minnesota Wisconsin Population (2009) 5.3 mm 5.7 mm Age under 18 24.3% 23.6% Age over 65 12.4% 13.2% Over 25, HS diploma 91.1% 89.0% Bachelor degree 31.2% 25.5% Below poverty line 10.0% 11.1% Foreign born 5.3% 3.6% Unemployment 5.8% 6.1% Not much to distinguish the states here. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:00 am
In the case, Hemphill v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:35 pm
” The parties in DM v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:32 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Parti v Aysha Hamad Nassir Sabah Al-Nassir Al Sabah & Ors [2007] EWHC 1869 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Tomy UK Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWHC 1889 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Vellacott v The Convergence Group Plc & Ors [2007] EWHC 1774 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Albon (t/a NA Carriage Co) v Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd & Anor (No 4) [2007] EWHC 1879 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Walker v Inter-Alliance Group Plc… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:38 pm
(David Bernstein) When we last encountered the Media Matters blog, its authors reacted to a George Will column on Rehabiltating Lochner by declaring that Lochner v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:01 pm
" Randall Little and Joel Arnold on behalf of the United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:44 pm
I am surprised to learn that I did not cover the Court of International Trade's classification decision in Alcan Food Packaging v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
Neenah Joint Sch Dist 498 F.3d 655, 48 IDELR 119 (7th Cir. 8/20/2007) and MM ex rel DM v Sch Dist of Greenville County 303 F.3d 523 (4th Cir. 2002). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:01 am
Dist Bd. of Educ v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm
The whole case, Mutual Management Services v. [read post]
