Search for: "State v. Magnuson" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
Rescind the FTC’s July 2021 “streamlining” of Magnuson-Moss Act (Section 18 of the FTC Act) consumer-protection rulemaking procedures. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation  to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Failing to receive a prompt response, Geldon added “[v]ery telling that you don’t even respond to text messages now that you don’t need help getting confirmed. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Magnuson (Ret.), Former Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court Hon. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:46 am by Daniel Bosch
The rule is based on a provision of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which states that federal regulators have the authority to place “observers” on fishermen’s boats. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am by Marcia Coyle
Congress enacted the Magnuson-Stevens law in response to overfishing of fisheries off the coast of the United States. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:35 pm
"... when interpreting ambiguous federal laws, a deference long targeted by conservatives concerned about the power of the administrative state. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]