Search for: "State v. Maguire"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The divisive opinion in Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 8:32 am
As the character Rod Tidwell so succinctly stated in 1996’s Jerry Maguire, “Show me the money! [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
’ The CJEU did agree and has agreed ever since.Yet, the impact of CJEU case law, even after more and consistent CJEU case law tackling the concept of originality, has not always been understood correctly by UK courts, with some judgments suggesting that ‘author’s own intellectual creation’ is an alternative phrase for ‘sufficient skill, labour or effort’ (Temple Island, para 27; Taylor v Maguire, para 8).More recent judgments support however the… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Christina [Maguire], for that introduction and congratulations on becoming President and CEO of the Society [for Corporate Governance] (the “Society”) this past January. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:24 am
Mrs Maguire appeals to the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
More recently, the court in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:43 pm
Contents include:LectureFleur Johns, International Law and the Provocations of the Digital: The 2021 Annual Kirby Lecture in International Law Special Issue In Honour of Judge James CrawfordDouglas Guilfoyle, Donald R Rothwell, & Margaret A Young, James Crawford: His Legacy and Impact on International Law in Australia and Globally Roman Kwiecień, The Formal Sources of International Law, the Relationship between Treaties and Custom, and the International Law-Making Process Alex Green, The… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His Majesty’s… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
R (on the application of Maguire) v His Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde and another – Whether the death of a disabled woman who was deprived of her liberty engaged the state’s obligation to protect life under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, therefore requiring an inquest jury to make findings regarding the circumstances by which the death occurred. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 4:41 pm
These included the so-called Irish cases (the Birmingham Six, Guildford Four and Maguire Seven) as well as the Cardiff Three case, the Broadwater Farm Three, Stefan Kiszko and others. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:07 am
For all the political tumult demanding – and exhausting – the attention of Americans – the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 12:49 pm
In the 1990s in Maguire v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:34 am
Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:38 pm
Mehta in Nunes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:17 am
Osborn, 260 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), quoting Maguire v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:17 am
Osborn, 260 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), quoting Maguire v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
