Search for: "State v. Mahr"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2022, 4:10 am
In Parbeen v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
In Soleimani v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
In Obaidi v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:05 am
In Seifeddine v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:05 am
In Omid v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:30 pm
The New Jersey case Odatalla v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 9:39 am
Recently, the issue of Islamic marriage contracts and other religious marriage contracts was discussed on the State Bar of Michigan Family Law Listserv. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:02 am
[So a Maryland appellate court held last month, I think quite correctly (and consistently with the broad trend in other states):] From Nouri v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:26 pm
A Michigan appellate court correctly enforces a Muslim couple's "mahr" agreement, entered at the time of the couple's marriage and calling for the husband to pay certain funds to the wife -- it's a valid contract, enforceable under secular law, regardless of its religious motivation.From Ali v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
From Khan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:40 pm
Obaidi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:54 pm
See also Alicea v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
Tarikonda v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:06 am
From Parbeen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Alulddin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:03 am
Id.The Odatalla court looked for guidance to Jones v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
This was also reaffirmed, specifically in the context of the Mahr, in Khamis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
This was also reaffirmed, specifically in the context of the Mahr, in Khamis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:03 am
United States (John Persell) The Duty Question in Special Relationship Negligence Cases: Preserving the Role of the Jury, Marshall v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:33 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
