Search for: "State v. Mak"
Results 81 - 100
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in Asadi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in Asadi v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:00 am
Life Technologies v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Harper v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Harper v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
(State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:51 pm
Crook, the Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, relies on "international opinion" to overturn its own precedent and to rule (in Roper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:17 am
In a recent decision that affects judicial elections in Kentucky and throughout the Sixth Circuit (Winter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:52 am
" The Eleventh Circuit panel disagreed, however, noting that this interpretation is contrary to the plain text of the rule, which prohibits "mak[ing] an untrue statement of material fact or omit[ting] to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:20 am
IntroductionThe Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea (“SCPNG”)’s recent decision in Namah v Pato [2016] PGSC 13; SC1497 (“Namah”) found the detention of asylum seekers (transferred from Australia to Papua New Guinea [“PNG”]) in a ‘regional processing centre’ on Manus Island to be ‘unconstitutional and illegal’. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:24 am
The Eleventh Circuit panel disagreed, however, noting that this interpretation is contrary to the plain text of the rule, which prohibits “mak[ing] an untrue statement of material fact or omit[ting] to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:19 pm
” The President has no direct power to change libel law, which consists of state law constrained by constitutional law as laid out by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Overbroad Anti-Speech Injunction Week continues here at the Volokh Conspiracy (see this post and this one), with a case decided Tuesday by the Arizona Court of Appeals, Streeter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 3:52 pm
Mauney, a North Carolina lawyer, was disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar In July 2013 for, among other professional violations, "mak[ing] demonstrably false statements under oath. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 6:48 am
That order was narrowed two weeks later, to be limited to “anything aimed at inciting others to harass, stalk, cyberstalk, or threaten [Quinn],” as well as “[v]iolations of [Rev. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:31 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:00 pm
The Federal Court of Appeal recently rejected this view in Wilson v. [read post]
