Search for: "State v. Mak" Results 161 - 175 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
The law actually forbids only those obstructions of official proceedings, he wrote, in which a defendant has “taken some action with respect to a document, record, or other object”—like, for instance, “cover[ing] up, falsif[ying], or mak[ing] a false entry in a record. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Devin DeBacker
“[A]nnually report[s] to Congress on cybersecurity threats and issues facing the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 2:17 pm
On June 12, 1997 the enterprise changed its legal status and became a State Joint Stock Company keeping the same title. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
As President Trump notes, one of the articles of impeachment [Article 10] charged President Johnson with insulting and denouncing Congress by "mak[ing] and declar[ing] … certain intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues … [which] are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm by RatnerPrestia
The PTO’s Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) appears to condone the practice of filing amendments or continu¬ations to disclaim parts of an original design where it states: “[t]he claim may be amended by broadening or narrowing its scope within the bounds of the disclosure as originally filed. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Coast Guard; Michael Murphy, the deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs; and Marie Mak, the director for contracting and national security acquisitions at the Government Accountability Office. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]