Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
[v] Private equity portfolio companies on track for most bankruptcies since 2020 | S&P Global Market Intelligence (spglobal.com) [vi] Instant Pot, Pyrex maker lands in bankruptcy through debt, private equity maneuvers | Crain’s Chicago Business [vii] Instant Pot, Pyrex maker says it will gauge sale offers in Chapter 11 | Crain’s Chicago Business [viii] The $11.8 billion mistake that led to Bed Bath & Beyond’s demise | CNN Business [ix]… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm
There's an FTC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Discretion Finally, many legal norms give discretion to a decision maker. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm
The FTC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Per the Court, the “kind of message matters in assessing confusion because consumers are not likely to think that the maker of a mocked product is itself doing the mocking. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:29 am
(Ford v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:29 am
The proposal will result in the provision of about 571 new burial spaces; 202 in Section V and 369 in Section 5 [8] [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm
[Jack Daniel's prevails against dog toy maker.] [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Board of Education, the landmark civil rights case out of that state. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
Here's the new complaint against Volvo, which interestingly was filed on the same day (yesterday) on which IV gave a formal patent-specific infringement notice to the Swedish car maker: Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court case, StoneRidge Investment Partners v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm
In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.Calling facial recognition “a novel and untested technology,” the court in… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[6] Despite the importance of assessing all important impacts, decision makers often focus on one impact or target or “silo,” and neglect the broader array.[7] Assessing all important impacts is a crucial and classic calling, but a cognitive challenge. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
Loretto v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am
” https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_findings-and-conclusions-in-us-v-american-activity-7066821377835626497-6QFM? [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
