Search for: "State v. Mann" Results 81 - 100 of 932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday and Friday 4 and 5 March 2021, Mann J conducted his final case management conference in the News Group phone hacking  litigation. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 25 and 26 February 2021 Mann J heard a case management conference in the Mirror phone hacking litigation, Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
The expert committee shall comprise Bhupinder Singh Mann (the National President of Bhartiya Kisan Union and All India Kisan Coordination Committee), Dr. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 26 and 27 November 2020 Mann J heard another CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:30 am by ernst
Not James Mann: The Mann Act’s Marbury Moment, which appears as 10 Journal of Law 105 (2020):James Mann (LC)In Caminetti v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:33 am by Dennis Crouch
The Supreme Court affirmed with the following guidance: The rule … is aptly stated by Mr. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on the same day there was a CMC in the case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd before Mann J. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Mann Foundation for Scientific Research, et al., No. 20-362 Notice and Damages: Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
In Reklos v Greece ([2009] ECHR 200). the Court stated that while the right to control the use of one’s image generally involves the possibility of refusing publication, “it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction” of that image. [read post]