Search for: "State v. Manus" Results 21 - 40 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 6:06 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
MPSEB, MANU/SC/0569/2010, was probably decided without noticing Section 2(4) or the decision of a co-ordinate Bench of the Supreme Court in State of MP v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:20 am
IntroductionThe Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea (“SCPNG”)’s recent decision in Namah v Pato [2016] PGSC 13; SC1497 (“Namah”) found the detention of asylum seekers (transferred from Australia to Papua New Guinea [“PNG”]) in a ‘regional processing centre’ on Manus Island to be ‘unconstitutional and illegal’. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:58 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Even the Supreme Court in this very case (dt. 03.10.2018) stated: “This was for the reason that the judgment of this Court, in TDM Infrastructure Private Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am by Howard Friedman
(forthcoming 2020).Ioanna Tourkochoriti, How Far Should the State Go to Counter Prejudice? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:49 am
However, based on the conclusion (or assumption) that Section 399(3) does not speak of consent in writing, the Court stated that the reasoning of the decision in Makhan Lal Jain v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:54 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Integrated Sales Service Ltd . and Ors MANU/MH/0265/2018 , where the court added another dimension to the debate. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:08 am
G.N.C.T. of Delhi, MANU/DE/3152/2009, was not persuaded by the Division Bench ruling in Madhu Intra. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In Commissioner of Endowments v Vittal Rao MANU/SC/1003/2004, a compromise was made during the course of writ proceedings. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In Commissioner of Endowments v Vittal Rao MANU/SC/1003/2004, a compromise was made during the course of writ proceedings. [read post]