Search for: "State v. Marble" Results 21 - 40 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
  But Ginsburg revised the state court's construction of state laws.Ginsburg doesn't even attempt to explain why it was wrong as a matter of constitutional principle for Bush v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[And, Property teachers, the Woodward Avenue tour (pp. 16-17) takes you within a block of the house at issue in Sanborn v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108; see Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762). [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
All the marbles may now reside at the United States Supreme Court, since the Court granted certiorari in Riegel, see our prior post, but the pendency of Supreme Court review doesn't seem to have weakened the force of the arguments in favor of preemption in cases involving pre-market approved ("PMA") medical devices. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762). [read post]