Search for: "State v. Marcotte"
Results 1 - 20
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 6:56 am
Marcott, supra. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
State Attorney General Lawsuit Exposures Covered Entities and their business associates now also need to be concerned about the potential that a state Attorney General may bring civil suit to remedy damages caused to state citizens by a breach of HIPAA. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
As this site explains, the state of Maryland “recognizes two kinds of divorce: limited and absolute. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
The HITECH Act empowers a state attorney general to sue covered entities or business associates engaging in HIPAA violations that harms citizens of the state for statutory damages equal to the sum of the number of violations multiplied by 100 up to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year plus attorneys fees and costs On January 13, 2010 Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal sued Health Net of Connecticut, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:25 pm
It’s not a coincidence that a movie about the demonic nature of female sexuality drew so much attention in the same year that the Supreme Court, with Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
©2015 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
In his May 9, 2014 order in Wright v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
As we approach the 38th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 11:54 pm
Marcotte, 193 F.3d 72 (2d Cir.1999), the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh, and District of Columbia Circuits apply a reasonableness test informed by the totality of the circumstances, see United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:33 am
United States v. [read post]
