Search for: "State v. Marcotte"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Under a judgment entered in Solis v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:25 pm
It’s not a coincidence that a movie about the demonic nature of female sexuality drew so much attention in the same year that the Supreme Court, with Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
©2012 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, P.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
As we approach the 38th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
©2011 Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, P.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:51 am
See Comit[eacute] de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas (CATA) v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Mayo Foundation v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am
The WHD Interpretation states that the FMLA does not require an employee who intends to assume the responsibilities of a parent to prove that he or she provides both day-to-day care and financial support to be found to stand in loco parentis to a child. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
State Attorney General Lawsuit Exposures Covered Entities and their business associates now also need to be concerned about the potential that a state Attorney General may bring civil suit to remedy damages caused to state citizens by a breach of HIPAA. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
The HITECH Act empowers a state attorney general to sue covered entities or business associates engaging in HIPAA violations that harms citizens of the state for statutory damages equal to the sum of the number of violations multiplied by 100 up to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year plus attorneys fees and costs On January 13, 2010 Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal sued Health Net of Connecticut, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Meyers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 11:54 pm
Marcotte, 193 F.3d 72 (2d Cir.1999), the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh, and District of Columbia Circuits apply a reasonableness test informed by the totality of the circumstances, see United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:33 am
United States v. [read post]
