Search for: "State v. Marino" Results 1 - 20 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
No said the Appellate Division in the Marino case.Frank Marino sued his employer, the Hauppauge Union Free School District, alleging that the district had violated his rights under Section 3013 of the Education Law by reducing his annual salary by $4,148.* The district persuaded a State Supreme Court judge to dismiss Marino’s complaint, contending that Marino complaint should be resolved under the grievance procedure set out in the Taylor Law… [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
Fraudulent Inducement Claims Rejected by CourtIn Shareholder Buyout Dispute The broad release language contained in a buyout agreement is enforced, despite claims of fraudulent inducement, affirms the Appellate Division of Superior Court in Marino v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
 That language -- like the language in CACI 201 -- comes directly from a California Supreme Court opinion that so stated. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Pennsylvania, No. 13-1078, and Marino v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]