Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 201 - 220
of 21,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 11:11 am
V. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
Part of the International Conflicts series Mark Drumbl: Bosnia v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:53 am
The Court applied the test for a public authority, as clarified by the Federal Court of Appeal in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
It would have been easy to state "BMW repair specialist", distinct from the word BMW (para 28). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Mark Brandon's new book, State of Union: Family and Change in the American Constitutional Order, will be out next month from the University Press of Kansas. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
In Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Kantor v Commissioner of Internal Revenue - The issue for decision in this case was whether the taxpayer was entitled under section 475(f) to use the mark-to-market method of accounting in connection with his business as a securities trader. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm
’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement and dilution claims brought by the Navajo Nation (The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
Thus, when evaluating the marks in their entireties, the marks were not likely to be confused. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 5:11 am
Gravelle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
In particular, he took notice of footnote number 2, which states as follow: "Rosetta Stone conducted a brand equity study in February 2009 showing a substantial gap in actual recognition of the Rosetta Stone mark and the closest competing brand. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Dr Joseph Fesenmair (Bird & Bird, Munich) then gave an explanation of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling last year in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:01 am
Defendant's Motion for Judicial Notice dated August13, 2007, filed in State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
